They were described as dishonest people who focused only on receiving a profit and gaining wealth. And court perceives that trading should serve for one community instead of individual, which seems to belittle and control merchants.
Doc 7, in contrast with Doc 6 of Islamic idea, Islamic court condemns tradesman who only works for profit. Doc 1 was from Christian Bible, the holy texts of the Christianity, documenting the words and major events from Jesus and his prophets, which is extremely important for Christianity. Document 3 was useful in representing how far merchants will go to make up for their shameful past in hopes of savoring their religion.
Dbq compare and contrast the attitudes of christianity and islam toward merchants document 5, the negative aspects of tradesmen were shown, but the positive manner they experienced in earlier time periods in Islamic history displays the change of opinion the Muslim community had over time on trade and merchants.
Another document that would be required to strengthen the evidence needed to support the Islamic viewpoints and display their opinion would be the journal of an Islamic merchant.
From Christians viewed merchants as often easily corrupted by riches, whereas Islam encouraged fair trade; however byChristians and Muslims both viewed merchants as immoral, unjust people. Documents 3 and 4 are also negative, but remain unchanged in the Christian society, whereas the Muslim viewpoint changed over time.
The Christian viewpoint remained unchanged, however, the Muslim viewpoint changed entirely. Naturally, this is a motive for him besides his dedication to his faith. Since this question is about attitudes about trade it would be more complete with documents portraying the views of more groups.
Document 3 was useful in representing how far merchants will go to make up for their shameful past in hopes of savoring their religion.
As time progressed, the Islamic opinions on trade seemed to shift drastically on a completely opposite viewpoint. However, both the Christian and Islamic religion shared their shift in attitudes and opinions over time from the beginning of the religions to the 16th century.
Muslim views began positively and ended negatively, but finished with a positive outlook. If the religious point of view consisted of a charitable outlook on trade and merchants was adopted, then the merchants would be directed to the strengthening of the empire through trade.
More essays like this: Document 3 was recorded much later in and discussed statements made from Godric, a merchant who had a biography written about himself by his colleague. Godric, says not to follow the life if a husbandman, but rather to study, learn and exercise the rudiment of more subtle conceptions.
More essays like this: This document was recorded in the 14th century and focused mostly on the negative aspects of tradesmen in the Muslim society. These letters to and from Italian merchants contrasts other documents with a positive outlook on merchants instead of a negative outlook.
Although the two religions initially have opposite ideas, before 16th century, they changed and assimilated individually and created their own peculiarity. Document 6 mostly focuses on strengthening the religious capital to serve the holy residents of the community.
Overall, document 1 states that wealthy merchants were frowned upon and prevented from entering heaven in the community, which supported the negative bias that Christians held. However, both the Christian and Islamic religion shared their shift in attitudes and opinions over time from the beginning of the religions to the 16th century.
Obviously, these two religions developed their own unique points of view toward commerce and trading through ever-changing society and different eras. In Christianity and Islam, in later years both hold merchants in low regard, but earlier on had varying opinions of money and merchants.
The holy book of the Muslims specifically named merchants as good people, but only if they were honest. As time went on, educated Christian and Muslim scholars began to voice why they both believed merchants to be immoral people [D4 and D5].
Through this description, we can see that Christians became more and more inclusive about trades as long as trades are entirely free double-dealing. Also, to fully understand how Christianity and Islam viewed merchants.
Because of his negative views that he developed concerning the wealth he obtained, he gave his possessions to the poor in order to compensate for his sins. Therefore, it shows that following God for spiritual sublimation is much better that the materialistically owning wealth, foiling the disdain to commerce of Christianity.
Therefore, Muslims of the fourteenth century perceive these reprehensive merchants utilizing tricks for gaining profits are no doubt deceiving people and conducting unjust events.
Aquinas and Khaldun clarify why their faiths look down upon merchants. They were described as dishonest people who focused only on receiving a profit and gaining wealth. Between 70 CE and CE, Christians and Muslims changed in their opinion of merchants, but stayed the same in their view of equitable transactions between people.
You would need to see whether actions taken by those who disliked merchants actually decreased their ability to trade in certain regions.
The document describes a strongly negative point of view on the position of trade and merchants in the Muslim community through these various insults and statements. Doc 1 was from Christian Bible, the holy texts of the Christianity, documenting the words and major events from Jesus and his prophets, which is extremely important for Christianity.
Document 7 This man was more worried about his own welfare that for the health of the group. The Islamic people saw this and disliked the merchant class. Both documents show the shift in point of view over time in a positive way.
The attitudes of Christian and Islamic people toward merchants and trade from religions' origins until about show change over time. At first Christians were against merchants and trade and the Muslim's were more fair towards them, but then attitudes changed when trading became wide spread and merchants gained peoples respect.5/5(1).
Using the documents, compare and contrast the attitudes of Christianity and Islam toward merchants and trade from the religions’ origins until about Are there. The attitudes of Christianity and Islam toward merchants and trade are different in the beginning stages, but as time passes each moderate their earlier views.
At the beginning Christians found it unfit to be a rich merchant, but Islam's judgment on trade was acceptable as long as justice was present.3/5(3).
Using the documents, compare and contrast the attitudes of Christianity and Islam toward merchants and trade from the religions’ origins until about Are there. DBQ Muslims V.
Christian Merchants Essay Sample In the beginning of Christianity, trade was considered sinful, while the Muslims thought trade was a lesson of appreciation and hard work.
Christians had a strongly negative attitude towards the interaction between trade and merchants. DBQ 3 Prompt: Attitudes of Christianity and Islam Using the documents compare and contrast the attitudes of Christianity and Islam toward merchants and trade from the religions’ origins until aboutDbq compare and contrast the attitudes of christianity and islam toward merchants